Interview with Holly Farrell

Neoteric Art: You are a self-taught painter born in Canada where you still live and work. Along the way have you ever considered art school?
Holly Farrell: When I began painting it was to alleviate the stress of day to day dealings of an emotionally draining job. I was heavily influenced by folk painting/tole painting which was fairly easy for me—copying and applying designs to wood, metal and paper. It was very much a hobby at this point—I was 29 years old. This process became too repetitive for me and I eventually moved on to canvases. I tried for a while to paint my own ‘primitive’ paintings but felt they weren’t very successful paintings. I felt that in order to be a good artist I should learn how to draw—that all good artists knew how to draw. Having no time or the funds for art school I felt my only option was to “wing it”. I would take things from my apartment…the day-to-day things that were part of my life and sit them down in front of me. These things became my subjects to practise my drawing. When I was ready to paint I applied the same technique I had learned with wood. The thought was always in my mind to eventually make it to art school to learn more about technique and art in general but I never got around to it. I think the day-to-day experiences I have with my paint have been my education. I certainly feel lucky that painting is my life. I think art school may help people develop skills and explore different methods in making art and it provides an atmosphere that encourages creativity. I wonder how different my life might have been in such an atmosphere.
NA: Your subject matter frequently incorporates a single object ranging from shoes, bowls, toys, hats, bow ties…and also with sparse room settings involving chairs, televisions, desks…. Describe your thinking and/or working process.
HF: I like to think I’m intuitive when it comes to choosing subject matter. I’m not a big planner. I’m also very impatient and when I think about something for too long the idea usually gets stale for me. I like being surprised when I paint so I don’t like to think too far ahead. As Still Life was initially a tool for me to learn how to draw and then paint, it was an accident that the paintings became my devotions to things common. I really do feel connected to the things that I paint. The subjects I paint are not always rooted in good memories – sometimes I’m trying to work out something ‘bad’ from the past. This has actually helped me find some good in the things that happened to me, an acceptance maybe? Anyway, I began painting only singular subjects for the most part—portraits of things, but during the past couple of years I have been attempting paintings of simple scenes which are a challenge to do because I am trying to keep the sense of Portraiture, the sense that we are looking at one thing, one thought, one memory.

Growing up in various towns along a highway I had friends who lived in town, on farms, in the woods—all walks of life it seemed. So I have direct experience with many of the subjects that I paint and I connect my subjects with the people, places or times I have known. I think of these things while I paint and try to ‘get it right’. And sometimes I change what I do (a little) when I think it needs it. I am not a realist painter. I think the best description for me, as one critic put it, is that I am a “folk realist”. I think this is because my work still has that folk element that comes with being self-taught. I struggle with what I see and what I feel and hope that the choices I make for a painting are the right ones.
NA: Which painters have been inspirational and influential for you…and why?
HF: I am not sure that there have been painters that have actually inspired me to paint in the manner that I paint—I had never intended to become a painter, I just kept going once I started. I love the work of John Brown who is a well respected Canadian painter. There was a retrospective of his work here in Toronto a couple of months ago which was breathtaking. I really like Mark Rothko’s work. I like how they make me feel. It’s odd but I find myself drawn to Abstract art more than Still Life. An exception would be Morandi. Someone referred to him during one of my shows and I looked him up – I have been a fan ever since. In the past ten years there has been a growing interest in art in Toronto that has enabled artists like Jennifer Harrison, Melissa Doherty and Douglas Walker (to name a few) to work at their painting full-time. In this kind of climate, where I, as well as my friends/peers are enjoying some success, it is difficult not to feel positive about working as a painter. Last, but not least, I do have to give great credit to many anonymous folk artists whose work I have seen here and there, in books and magazines. I initially wanted to be a ‘real’ primitive painter but it wasn’t in the cards. I feel I am still rooted in the folk aesthetic, mainly in it’s simplicity of form and colour and I think this is always in the back of my mind when I paint.
NA: You are represented by 3 galleries in Canada and 2 in the US. How has your experience been dealing with these varied galleries?
Working with galleries is fairly new to me as for the past 16 years I have sold most of my work through my studio. I had always felt that a gallery should be able to do more for the artist than the artist could do for themselves. As art was my only income I had to consider what it would mean to give a gallery 50%—what for, right? Well, galleries can offer exposure to new people, and should the work sell will result in higher prices. I have been lucky so far to have had good experiences with my galleries. I am still selling work on my own but the majority of my income now comes from the galleries.

NA: What are some of your short and long term goals for your work?
HF: At present, short term goals go into 2009. With art, life seems to be allocated into six month segments which go fairly quickly. Starting August I will be focussing on a solo show in Vancouver for January which is then followed by a solo show in Tokyo in March. Doing shows for galleries allows me to plan a group of paintings for a specific space that will hang well together—something that I wasn’t as concerned with working on my own.
I don’t really have any long term goals—I’m a bit superstitious that way. I will consider myself very lucky if I can continue to support myself painting as it’s the only job I’ve had that I’ve been able to do with any success. And I actually love what I do. Maybe, sometime in the future, I would like to experiment a bit—find time to try some ‘loose’ painting…whatever that means.
I always strive to be a better painter.
Category: Interviews 6 comments »

June 23rd, 2008 at 8:59 am
I really like the simplicity and directness of Holly’s work. I can also relate to a lot of what she says about her working and thought process.
June 24th, 2008 at 8:45 am
Those warm greys she hits so consistently are beautiful. They definitely feel like ‘good memories’.
What are the dimensions on these paintings?
June 24th, 2008 at 9:57 am
All these paintings and dimensions are on Holly’s Web site which is listed at the end of the interview.
June 24th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
I find your approach to your career inspiring and I like your pragmatic approach to gallery representation. You do your great work justice by that. Thank you for sharing!
September 27th, 2008 at 8:18 am
I missed this interview somehow and really like the work. The Minimalist sensibility makes your feelings for Rothko completely understandable. Your color choices are as nuanced as your composition and placement.
Wonderful work!
January 15th, 2009 at 11:18 am
Thank you very much for your comments – they are greatly appreciated.
Holly Farrell